The Neo-Neo debates in International Relations

 The "neo-neo" debate refers to a discussion among scholars in the field of International Relations (IR) about the best approach to understanding the world of global politics. The debate emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the dominant paradigms of realism and neoliberalism, which were seen as inadequate in explaining the new international landscape after the end of the Cold War.

On one side of the debate are neo-realists, who maintain a traditional realist focus on power and the anarchic nature of the international system, but recognize the growing importance of non-state actors in international politics. On the other side are neo-liberals, who argue that international cooperation, rather than competition and conflict, is the dominant feature of the new international system. They point to the increasing number of international institutions, such as the European Union and the World Trade Organization, as evidence of this trend towards cooperation.

Critics of both neo-realism and neo-liberalism argue that these approaches are too narrow and fail to consider the complexity of the international system and the role of non-state actors. They call for a more nuanced approach that takes into account the cultural, social, and economic dimensions of international relations. This perspective is often referred to as the "English School" or "International Society" approach, which emphasizes the role of norms, culture, and shared values in shaping international relations.

Overall, the neo-neo debate reflects the ongoing evolution of International Relations as a discipline, as scholars seek to better understand the rapidly changing world of global politics. The debate also highlights the importance of considering multiple perspectives and approaches in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the complexities of the international system.

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 8409930081 (Paid)