E. H Carr’s critique of idealism

  Edward Hallett Carr was a British historian and political commentator who criticized the idealist tradition in international relations theory. Idealism, also known as utopianism or Wilsonianism, is a perspective that emphasizes the role of international norms and institutions in promoting peace and cooperation between nations. Carr argued that idealists were overly optimistic about the ability of international institutions and legal agreements to prevent war and conflict.

In his book, "The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939," Carr argued that idealists ignored the realities of power politics and failed to appreciate the importance of self-interest in shaping state behavior. He argued that idealists believed that a moral, ethical, or legal order could be established in international relations and that this order would constrain the behavior of states. Carr argued that this view was naive and ignored the historical record, which showed that states had frequently acted in their own self-interest, regardless of international agreements or norms.

Carr also criticized idealists for their belief in the possibility of absolute moral principles and the possibility of disinterested decision-making. He argued that all actions and decisions were influenced by interests, whether they were economic, political, or ideological, and that these interests could not be separated from the decision-making process.

Overall, Carr's critique of idealism challenged the prevailing view in international relations at the time and paved the way for more realistic and cynical perspectives, such as realism and neorealism. While his views were controversial, they have had a lasting impact on the discipline of international relations and continue to be discussed and debated to this day.

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 8409930081 (Paid)